<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SSRS Execution Time Types and Optimization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinknook.com/ssrs-execution-time-types-and-optimization-2011-11-13/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinknook.com/ssrs-execution-time-types-and-optimization-2011-11-13/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ssrs-execution-time-types-and-optimization</link>
	<description>Because the world needs another Business Intelligence blog!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 19:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amit Srivastava</title>
		<link>http://thinknook.com/ssrs-execution-time-types-and-optimization-2011-11-13/#comment-483</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amit Srivastava]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 08:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinknook.com/?p=207#comment-483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi ,
I grouped  50 reocrds per page and obviosly number of pages reduces to 5019, but no significant optimisation in excel render, just a matter of few milliseconds, contrary to that, report execution time increases, which is quite obvious.

Also HTML took lesser time than EXCEL, and it could be as EXCEL is slowest one as you suggest also.

Please let me know is there any option to reuce excel rendering time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi ,<br />
I grouped  50 reocrds per page and obviosly number of pages reduces to 5019, but no significant optimisation in excel render, just a matter of few milliseconds, contrary to that, report execution time increases, which is quite obvious.</p>
<p>Also HTML took lesser time than EXCEL, and it could be as EXCEL is slowest one as you suggest also.</p>
<p>Please let me know is there any option to reuce excel rendering time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://thinknook.com/ssrs-execution-time-types-and-optimization-2011-11-13/#comment-481</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinknook.com/?p=207#comment-481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Amit,

Did you try rendering the report in a different format, such as Html, and was that quick or just as slow?

Can you also paste in the stats you have for each of the SSRS report processing steps when rendered to EXCEL, so:
&gt; Data Retrieval:
&gt; Data Processing:
&gt; Data Rendering:

One of the options I would recommend trying is to lower the number of pages down by grouping records under the same page (so if you have 40 record per page, you could cut down your number of pages in half), is this something do-able? or do you have a specific business requirements for that number of pages? it just feels awfully a lot.

It might also be worth trying to optimise other processing times, so the over-all report time looks faster, even if rendering time was still slow. The reason I say that is because Its difficult to optimise for rendering, as we have little control over what goes on in the rendering engine itself, but here are some tips that might help you get started: &lt;a href=&quot;http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb522806.aspx#Render&quot; window=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SSRS Rendering Optimisation&lt;/a&gt;, I didnt find them overly helpful, but it always depends on the situation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Amit,</p>
<p>Did you try rendering the report in a different format, such as Html, and was that quick or just as slow?</p>
<p>Can you also paste in the stats you have for each of the SSRS report processing steps when rendered to EXCEL, so:<br />
> Data Retrieval:<br />
> Data Processing:<br />
> Data Rendering:</p>
<p>One of the options I would recommend trying is to lower the number of pages down by grouping records under the same page (so if you have 40 record per page, you could cut down your number of pages in half), is this something do-able? or do you have a specific business requirements for that number of pages? it just feels awfully a lot.</p>
<p>It might also be worth trying to optimise other processing times, so the over-all report time looks faster, even if rendering time was still slow. The reason I say that is because Its difficult to optimise for rendering, as we have little control over what goes on in the rendering engine itself, but here are some tips that might help you get started: <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb522806.aspx#Render" window="_blank" rel="nofollow">SSRS Rendering Optimisation</a>, I didnt find them overly helpful, but it always depends on the situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amit Srivastava</title>
		<link>http://thinknook.com/ssrs-execution-time-types-and-optimization-2011-11-13/#comment-479</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amit Srivastava]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinknook.com/?p=207#comment-479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi ,
I have SSRS 2012 report having 12432 pages , each page consist of 20 records..
Now Excel export took lot of time to render data.
Is there is any way to reduce Excel export time (Rendering time) od ssrs report ?
Please suggest.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi ,<br />
I have SSRS 2012 report having 12432 pages , each page consist of 20 records..<br />
Now Excel export took lot of time to render data.<br />
Is there is any way to reduce Excel export time (Rendering time) od ssrs report ?<br />
Please suggest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.w3-edge.com/products/


Served from: thinknook.com @ 2026-05-05 07:48:20 by W3 Total Cache
-->